We look forward to talking with with you.
Contact us today!
In the business world, companies frequently expand into adjacent product lines as a natural extension of their core business. Sometimes this works brilliantly. Other times — think Ben-Gay Aspirin or Smith & Wesson mountain bikes — a product extension that looks logical on paper falls flat in practice.
Using your payroll provider as your 401(k) third party administrator (TPA) falls squarely into that second category.
Payroll providers market their retirement plan services as “seamless” because they’re integrated with payroll. But the only genuine overlap between payroll and 401(k) administration is the deduction of employee salary deferrals from paychecks — and that process is largely automated. Everything else that makes 401(k) administration complex has nothing to do with payroll.
Proper retirement plan administration involves:
Errors in any of these areas can trigger IRS or Department of Labor penalties — or in serious cases, plan disqualification. The stakes are high, and payroll providers are simply not equipped to manage them at the level a dedicated TPA is.
Much of 401(k) compliance testing depends on accurate data gathered from the plan sponsor each year. A qualified TPA sends a year-end data request form and then works closely with the plan sponsor to ensure the information is complete and correct — particularly on complex questions about ownership, affiliated entities, officers, and employee classifications.
Payroll provider TPAs skip that hand-holding. They send the data request form and expect plan sponsors to fill it out correctly, whether or not they understand what’s being asked.
The result? Faulty data leads to faulty testing results.
A real-world example illustrates the risk: one payroll provider TPA asked its client to identify all “key employees” for the plan’s top-heavy test. A key employee under IRS rules is an officer earning over $160,000, a 5% owner, or a 1% owner earning over $160,000. The plan sponsor didn’t know that definition — they simply selected every employee who was important to running the business, including hourly workers earning $30,000. The plan failed its top-heavy test as a result.
A competent TPA would have caught that error immediately. The payroll provider TPA did not.
Most qualified TPAs assign each plan sponsor a dedicated administrative representative — someone who knows the plan, can answer questions directly, and is accountable when something goes wrong.
Payroll provider TPAs reserve dedicated contacts for their largest clients. Everyone else gets a team approach. In practice, this means it’s difficult to identify who actually worked on your plan, and important details routinely fall through the cracks.
Setting up a retirement plan isn’t just about compliance — it’s about maximizing retirement savings for participants and owners alike. A knowledgeable TPA will explore options including:
Payroll provider TPAs typically administer only straightforward, “vanilla” 401(k) plans. Clients with more complex needs — or clients who are failing discrimination tests year after year — often go unadvised about better plan designs that could solve their problems.
Many employers who use payroll provider TPAs also lack an independent financial advisor for their plan — which creates significant fiduciary exposure. Payroll providers may suggest investment fund lineups, but they are not fiduciaries. They are not legally liable for investment losses suffered by participants, and they are not obligated to avoid funds that pay high revenue sharing back to themselves.
This was confirmed in the 2010 case Zhang v. Paychex, in which a federal court in Western New York dismissed a fiduciary breach claim against Paychex because the company’s agreements with plan sponsors expressly disclaimed fiduciary status. The practical effect: investment suggestions from a payroll provider TPA carry no legal weight — but the plan sponsor and its fiduciaries remain fully exposed.
Payroll providers do their core job well, and they do it affordably. But 401(k) plan administration is a different discipline — one that requires technical expertise, proactive client service, sophisticated plan design knowledge, and genuine accountability.
While a very small plan with a safe harbor design (which eliminates most discrimination testing) might get by with a payroll provider TPA, for most plan sponsors the risks outweigh the convenience. The administration problems, the data errors, the lack of personalized service, and the fiduciary gaps are consistent patterns — not isolated incidents.
When selecting a TPA for your retirement plan, choose one whose core business is retirement plan administration. Your employees’ retirement security — and your own liability — depend on it.
